52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks (17): What was “ordinary life” like in much of North America in the late 1700s?

This past week I’ve been delving further into one of my husband’s branches of our family tree. It’s impossible to do this without thinking about the history of the Maritime Provinces (New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, at least) and what it must have been like back then. I have lots of history to share, and quite a bit about this particular ancestor of interest, Loyalist Elijah Miles, who made his way from Connecticut to Maugerville, New Brunswick when the Brits lost the war with the Colonies. His story can tell us quite a bit about life – and political and religious tensions – at the time. However, I think I’ll save his story for the next “episode” and instead lay the groundwork by sharing excepts from an article I found about what “ordinary life” was like in New Brunswick (and pretty well everywhere else) in the latter part of the 1700s. History comes alive better when we try to understand what life was like for those who’ve come before us.

Map of New Brunswick showing the location of Maugerville on the Saint John River
Ordinary Life in Early Maugerville, written by James Hannay in 1900 and published in Canadian History, Educational Review, Supplementary, can be found in its entirety in John Wood’s blog post on New Brunswick history. It’s long, but I think you’ll find it as instructive as I did. As you’re reading, keep in mind that this was written by someone who has the advances made by 1900 in mind. He is comparing how much better life is in his time compared to 120-130 years before, and he’s writing this before the roads were needed for anything besides horse-pulled carts. He’s writing this before houses were electrified, before houses had indoor plumbing, and before anyone had heard of a radio … and he marvels at how primitive life was 120-130 years prior. I think his descriptions have to be similar for early homesteaders in many parts of North America.

From Hannay’s essay:
“The English settlers who made their homes in New Brunswick from 1762 onward … were mainly from Massachusetts, where their ancestors had settled more than a century before.

Life for people in Saint John was lonely enough and full of hardships, for they had no other connection with the outside world than the occasional trips of the sloops which made voyages between Saint John and Newburyport (MA), carrying lime, lumber and fish. But even in this respect they were highly favored in comparison with the settlers at Maugerville, Gagetown and other points upriver who had no other means of communication with each other or with the people at the mouth of the river but by boats. For it must be remembered that there were no roads in the province in those days. As a consequence there were no wheeled vehicles, except carts, and this state of affairs continued to the year 1781, or later, for when Jonathan Burpee, one of the wealthiest farmers in the Maugerville settlement, died in that year, the inventory of his estate shows that he possessed neither wagon nor sleigh, but only the ironwork of a cart and half the woodwork. We may therefore infer that this cart was owned by Mr. Burpee jointly with a neighbor, and was used for the purpose of carrying the produce of their fields to their barns.

The people of the present day are so accustomed to roads and railways that they find it difficult to realize what it means to be without them. But to the new settler a road is everything, for without it he can neither obtain the supplies which he needs nor market his products. Happy, indeed, are the people of the present generation who have not only good roads, but railways. The difference in efficiency between a road and a railway may be judged from the fact that a ton of goods cannot be moved over a common road for less than twenty five cents a mile, while on a long haul, a ton of goods can be carried over a railway for half a cent a mile. Forty years ago there was no railway between Saint John and Fredericton, and the people of the latter place had to get their supplies by steamer or schooner in the autumn before the close of navigation by the ice. A Saint John business man who had contracted to deliver 500 barrels of flour in Fredericton found himself caught with the flour on his hands at Saint John as the river froze. The cost of sending that flour by teams over the Nerepis road to Fredericton was very heavy, and took all the profit out of his contract.

These early settlers lived in a very primitive fashion and their lives were hard. They resided in log houses, most of them of small size and very scantily furnished. In the inventory of Deacon Jonathan Burpee’s estate, the total value of his furniture is put down at £5 7s. 8d. It consisted of four bedsteads, two tables, two large chairs, ten small chairs, and a looking-glass. There were also two chests and a pair of andirons. There is here a total absence of articles of comfort, to say nothing of luxury. There do not appear to have been either carpets or rugs in this rich farmer’s house. There was no such thing as a couch or sofa, and the chairs were no doubt of the old fashioned straight-backed pattern, so as to be as uncomfortable as possible. Our ancestors seemed to have looked upon it as wrong to be comfortable. There are people even now who act on this principle, but they are very much in the minority.

Kitchen stoves had not been invented one hundred and thirty years ago, and all the cooking for the family had to be done at an old-fashioned fireplace. The great feature of a fireplace was its capacity for consuming fuel without giving out any heat. A quarter of a cord of wood might be burning in the fireplace while the people at the back of the room were freezing. The kitchen utensils of Deacon Burpee consisted of three iron pots, an iron kettle, two iron pans, a frying pan, a gridiron, a toasting iron, and a brass kettle. Cooking at a fireplace was done under the greatest difficulties, the heavy pots having to be lifted on to and off a crane which stretched across the fireplace. To keep one of these huge fireplaces in fuel in cold weather took no small part of the labor of one man. Meat had to be roasted before the fire and bread was baked in a bake-kettle — a large pot with a flat bottom and cover. This was placed among the hot ashes and covered with large live coals from the fire. Wonderful results were obtained from this primitive system of cookery, yet it was wasteful as well as laborious.

The food of the people in those days was neither varied nor abundant. In the Maugerville settlement a good deal of corn was ground and it was regarded as the staple crop. We do not grow corn in New Brunswick now, because it can be produced more cheaply elsewhere, but some farmers in Maugerville grew it in large quantities about the year 1770. David Burpee, whose diary has been preserved, grew fifty bushels of corn in the year 1775. The price of corn varied from four shillings a bushel to nine shillings. Wheat was not much grown in New Brunswick at that time. Much of the grain was ground in hand mills, a slow and laborious method, but the only one available where there were no grist-mills near the settler.

While wages were thus low everything that had to be purchased in the way of clothing was costly. Cotton goods cost about ten times as much then as they do now. The ordinary dress of both men and women was homespun. Sheep were kept on every farm for their wool. This was carded and spun by hand, and woven into cloth on a hand loom of which there was one in almost every home. Flax was also grown and spun on these little old-fashioned wheels which are now in such request as curiosities. Every farm was capable of producing the ordinary clothing and bedding of the people who lived and worked upon it. But the converting of wool and flax into clothing was laborious and placed a good deal of work upon the women of the farm from which they are now free. The men might shear the sheep and heckle the flax but the carding, spinning and weaving had all to be done by the women.

Most of the men wore leather breeches, a garment which, however durable, could hardly have been comfortable. But every man who aspired to respectability aimed to have one good suit of broadcloth, which was expected to last him for twenty years. In the note of accounts of David Burpee we have the particulars of a suit which he purchased for himself in 1777. There were 3¾ yards of broadcloth at 20 shillings, 3 yards shalloon at 4 shillings, buttons, trimmings, etc., the whole amounting to £4 16s. 3d. After the tailor had been paid this suit probably cost David Burpee £6, or as much as he would be able to earn in ten weeks by working for others at the current rate of wages. This fact will serve to show the great difference in the conditions of life between that time and the present, and it also explains the fact that the clothing of a dead man was valued and included in the inventory of his effects, and sold as part of the estate.

Life in Maugerville one hundred and thirty years ago offered but little in the way of amusements. Musical instruments were unknown in the farmhouses of that day. Now every farm house has its cabinet organ or piano. There were few social meetings, and almost the only events that brought the people together were the services held by itinerant preachers. Even these were not frequent, and there was no settled minister until 1774, and he had but a brief career, for he turned rebel and fled to Maine in 1777. School privileges were few, and the teaching was usually done in the winter by one of the settlers who was fortunate enough to possess a better education than his neighbor. Thus David Burpee taught school in the winter of’1778-79, receiving 3s. 11½d. per month for each scholar. So far as his accounts show he had only seven scholars. The more closely we view the condition of the people of past generations the more clear it appears that the “good old times” of which some people talk are mainly in the imaginations of men, and that there was never a period in, the history of this province when its people were so prosperous and happy as they are at the present day.”
—–

What strikes me about this description is that it was written 120+ years ago, about a time 120+ years before that. The author describes just how different it is in his time, and we could write volumes about how incredibly different it is now, 120+ years hence. But I’m guessing that if we were to look at what was life was like for the ancestors I’ve written about who arrived in New Netherland in the 1635-1656 period (120+ years before the Maugerville settlers), it wouldn’t be very different at all. Isn’t history fascinating!

A depiction of activity at the Maugerville river pier in those early days. Maugerville was the first English settlement on the Saint John River. (Source: Maugerville River Roll)

This entry was posted in 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks (17): What was “ordinary life” like in much of North America in the late 1700s?

  1. swabby429 says:

    The descriptions of garment-making and the scarcity of fashionable attire contrast with our modern day problem of fast-fashion clothing that pollutes landfills. I’m sure that our ancestors would not be amused.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. It was so different in every country. So much harder than it is today, yet we complain.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Deb says:

    I got a bit stuck on that portion of the essay talking about the cost of a suit for a man at the time and the fact that said suit was of so great a value that it was sold off after death…I assume that $ went to pay debts still outstanding rather than as a means for his wife/family to have a bit of $ to start out again? Plus the poor guy was buried in what? His long johns or simply naked with one of those “homespun” shrouds wrapped around him! That made me ponder the growing industry of green burials today and the return to the use of shrouds and direct burial. So interesting that we are embracing this trend from 300 years ago- one I firmly believe in by the way as a way to give something back to the earth.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Jane Fritz says:

      Hmm, I think the author, from so long ago himself, meant to be illustrating the value of a suit relative to his other paltry belongings. As part of his estate, it would be used in whatever way was possible or necessary in the circumstances, paying off debts possibly, but also to be used ongoing needs of his household. And in those days, wives were even more likely to die young (in childbirth, TB, etc) than men, so the estate may well have passed to his children. I can imagine that if a man were buried in his suit, his family was giving the sign of just how well off he was!

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Victoria says:

    I love this first person peek into history and his looking back, considering the advances of his own time. Daily living nuances are a curiosity for me…so many fascinating bits. Especially the reality that clothing was precious and considered an asset upon death. Fascinating. Thank you, Jane! 🥰

    Liked by 1 person

    • Jane Fritz says:

      I’m glad you enjoyed this reporting of the “olden days”, too, Vicki. I got stuck on only having wooden straight back chairs. I’m guessing the beds weren’t overly comfy either! But they were probably all so tired from hard physical work that they didn’t notice.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. heimdalco says:

    Oh, my goodness! What a lovely & telling chronicle &, Yes, what we might write in OUR time would be so vastly different. We cannot imagine living in THAT time.

    This also makes me extremely grateful to the point that I will never again complain about having to unload the dishwasher.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Lookoom says:

    I like the idea that the past wasn’t so perfect, and that it’s better to work to improve the present than to fall into a nostalgia for the past. Although lessons can usefully be drawn from it.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Jane Fritz says:

      Isn’t that the case? We are inclined to think things were better ‘before’, regardless of what generation we grew up in. We have a romanticized view of yesteryear. But, I agree, Lookoom, we sure could to better at improving the present.

      Liked by 1 person

  7. This post was so insightful, and it certainly puts the early settlers lives into perspective. I feel for the woman who had to make all their bedding and clothes, especially if they had a lot of kids who were outgrowing clothing at a rapid rate. Thanks for sharing!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Jane Fritz says:

      I know, it’s mind-blogging. And to wash anything, they’d have to haul water from somewhere and then heat it over a fireplace. It’s really impossible to imagine. That’s not even considering what it was like to make meals for MANY children and clean dishes. Gulp!

      Liked by 1 person

  8. Eilene Lyon says:

    Even in the 1850s my ancestors were growing and weaving their own wool and flax for clothing (called linsey-woolsy). From the painting, which shows a substantial community, I would tend to think the author understated the socializing and amusements those settlers had. I also expect there were fiddles and flutes and a few other instruments around.

    It really is tough for us to imagine living in those times, but of course, they didn’t know much different.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Jane Fritz says:

      That’s a good point about the occasional fiddle being available. It’s tough for us to imagine, and also tough to truly realize just how much work had to go into getting everyday activities done without electricity, running water, well-stocked stores, or factory-made goods. You’d sleep well at night!

      Liked by 1 person

  9. Bernie says:

    It’s so interesting to read what a historian type wrote in 1900! Wow, what changes. Life was so much work then. I remember my mom saying old houses had small closets as you only had one good set of clothes.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Jane Fritz says:

      Thanks for this, Bernie. I think your mom made a really good point, and that observation leads to the question of whether there isn’t a case for a balance between then and now. Do people really need to have giant walk-in closets filled with clothes and shoes?!

      Like

  10. Roy McCarthy says:

    Absorbing piece. How do you pronounce the ‘Mauger’ in Maugerville Jane? It’s a common family name here and can be pronounced either ‘Major’ or ‘Mo-jay’.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Jane Fritz says:

      Good eye, Roy, very good. I thought of you when I read the early history of Maugerville. We pronounce it Majorville, and I had always assumed that it was just another oddity of how things evolve. But, no, it is actually named for Joshua Mauger, a bigwig shipowner and merchant in Halifax, NS who was indeed born in Jersey. He has HQ’d in Halifax from 1749-60 before relocating to England. He had interceded with the Brit colonial govt on behalf of early settlers there to allow them to keep the land they were on, and they named the settlement in his recognition. Jersey connections are everywhere!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.