Map Monday: Playing with map locations and “real” country sizes

It was way back in 1569 when Flemish geographer and philosopher Gerardus Mercator created a new map projection, one that allows navigators to know where they are in the world along straight lines of latitude and longitude in 2 dimensions (when the world is inconveniently in 3 dimensions).  It was a remarkable breakthrough nearly 500 years ago, and it remains our most familiar map projection today, the Mercator projection, complete with gigantic Greenland.

We’ve seen lots of maps showing what the sizes of countries are really like in relation to each other, sizes which are increasingly distorted on the Mercator projection as you get farther away from the equator. Thanks to Bored Panda, I’ve learned about a neat online tool, found at thetruesize.com, that let’s you play with countries on a map, moving them to new locations to see how their sizes really compare. I’ll let the examples used by Bored Panda show you the kind of fun you can have playing with this tool. You might even want to give thetruesize.com a try yourself!

 

 

This entry was posted in Map Monday and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

37 Responses to Map Monday: Playing with map locations and “real” country sizes

  1. Really fun—and illuminating!—to move those countries here and there. Thanks for sharing.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Victoria says:

    Amazing! Thanks, Jane – for your post and for sharing your resources. Pictures worth 1000 words…or more. xo! 😉

    Liked by 1 person

  3. swabby429 says:

    I’ve always been fussy about geographical topics like this. This is one reason why I like to have a globe in my home.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Jane Fritz says:

      Yes, we have one, too. Mind you, my husband’s grandfather gave it to him 70+ years ago, so many of the country names and boundaries have changed significantly. Another piece of mankind’s history superimposed on our planet!

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Deb says:

    Even though it was drilled into my head in elementary school it’s still all too easy to forget that the earth IS NOT flat and there are no grid lines IRL 🙂 Some of those comparisons were actually pretty shocking Jane!

    Liked by 1 person

  5. The need for perspective. Thanks Jane, so very powerful!

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Eilene Lyon says:

    So fun! I love maps. I even got a minor in Geographic Information Systems. Of course learning all about various map projections was early in the courses. I keep a globe at home, so it does give one a better perspective of relative country and land mass sizes.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Jane Fritz says:

      Cool, GIS is quite well known in our area, but I don’t usually hear of folks from elsewhere studying it. Our university (UNB) has a world class Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering dept that has spun off a few very successful GIS companies whose HQs are here. Good choice!

      Liked by 1 person

  7. So intriguing, Jane, and fun! It certainly helps change perspective.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. That was fun! It certainly puts things in perspective, too. Cool share, Jane.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Trenholm says:

    This is a really interesting and timely post, Jane. We are currently in Western Australia and attended an ‘enrichment talk’ yesterday about the Australia state we are visiting. Western Australia is Australia’s largest state. The speaker also did an overlay of the state on a world map and showed us if Western Australia was a country, it would be the sixth largest country in the world. Amazing what one can learn from maps, especially if one has a visual learning style.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Jane Fritz says:

      What fun, Barb. And what a great example. If we didn’t rely so heavily on the Mercator projection (for good reasons), we wouldn’t have these distorted perceptions of country size. I think I’ll try out what Alaska is like when it’s moved down to, say, Texas! 😏 Enjoy the remainder of your trip!

      Like

  10. Ally Bean says:

    The last image with the US and Australia is fascinating. I had no idea that the two countries were about the same size. 

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Bernie says:

    Whoa. Those make for some interesting comparisons. And the comment about the size of Western Australia as a country. The one that always stuck with me is that the entire British Isles would fit inside Saskatchewan.

    Like

  12. heimdalco says:

    WOW! An entirely different perspective. When I think of these maps (every now & then) I probably won’t think of them as I always have but will see them in my head as you’ve shown them here. Thanks for sharing

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Rose says:

    These different perspectives are fascinating and certainly show how distorted the world is mapped out currently. We have both wall maps and globes and it’s interesting what we learn when we place them near each other for comparison.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Jane Fritz says:

      That’s the perfect thing to do, Rose. What a clever family! And comparing the true size (on the globe) with the obvious inadequacies of the 2-D substitute (your wall map) is also a reminder of how important that 2-D breakthrough was all those centuries ago. It’s hard to navigate from a globe!!

      Like

  14. heimdalco says:

    No extra confusion just interesting seeing things from a different perspective, WHICH, in the grand scheme of things may encourage some of your readers, like me, to actually remember the locations of these countries geographically. That’s a positive thing.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Margaret says:

    Wow! What an eye opener!
    Thanks Jane 🙏🏼

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.